Skip to content
Federal Criminal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayRobert S. LeachElizabeth A. HolmescrossDay 40 - November 30, 2021Holmes acknowledged authority over Theranos, regretted the company's treatment of Erika Cheung, and accepted responsibility for mishandling the Wall Street Journal response while facing questions about device use, pharmaceutical reports, and company finances. The court found Balwani unavailable to testify, deferred a final ruling on parts of his deposition, and resolved other evidentiary matters.
← Day 39Federal Criminal TrialDay 41 →

Day 40 - November 30, 2021

Holmes Crossed on Theranos's Response and Control; Balwani Found Unavailable

Judge Edward J. Davila
3Proceedings
3Pages
1Witnesses
3,523Lines
Day 40 of 51
Appearing:

Holmes acknowledged authority over Theranos, regretted the company's treatment of Erika Cheung, and accepted responsibility for mishandling the Wall Street Journal response while facing questions about device use, pharmaceutical reports, and company finances. The court found Balwani unavailable to testify, deferred a final ruling on parts of his deposition, and resolved other evidentiary matters.

Full day summary

Before the jury entered, the court questioned whether the defense had established the requirements for admitting excerpts from Ramesh Balwani's SEC deposition and directed the parties to address completeness issues. In a separate evidentiary discussion, the court permitted the prosecution to test Holmes's testimony about her agency and relationship with Balwani but identified extravagant expenses as the boundary for lifestyle evidence and required the government to explain the purpose of particular exhibits. On cross-examination, Holmes acknowledged that Theranos was deeply concerned about John Carreyrou's reporting, regretted its treatment of Erika Cheung, and accepted responsibility for mishandling the Wall Street Journal response. She also confirmed her authority as founder, chief executive, majority voting shareholder, and Balwani's supervisor. Holmes testified that the MiniLab and 4 Series were never used for patient testing, that the Edison 3.5 ran 12 California laboratory assays, and that most of the broader menu used commercial equipment. She further acknowledged applying pharmaceutical-company logos to Theranos-prepared reports and sending altered reports outside the company. Financial records showed pressure from an $18.5 million refund and new investment proceeds shortly before the Walgreens launch, though Holmes disputed that Theranos was almost out of money. The court later found Balwani unavailable to testify after his attorney represented that he would invoke the Fifth Amendment in response to substantive questions. It excluded Exhibit C as cumulative under Rule 403, deferred a final ruling on the financial-model deposition excerpts while indicating that only some would probably be admitted, and admitted Defense Exhibit 14259. The court also set deadlines for updated jury instructions and a preliminary charging-conference discussion.

1. Defense Motion 1163, Balwani Excerpts, and Cross-Examination Scope

Outside the jury's presence, the court opened the day by considering Balwani deposition excerpts and the permissible scope of cross-examination concerning Holmes's agency, travel, and lifestyle evidence.

Procedural
Morning Convening Outside the Jury's Presence

Court convened at 8:31 a.m. with the jury outside the courtroom.

Procedural
Hearing on Defense Motion 1163 and Balwani Deposition Excerpts
107 lines

The court questioned whether Balwani's deposition excerpts qualified as statements against interest, directed further Rule 106 work, accepted the defense's withdrawal of the null-protocol portion, and deferred the remaining discussion.

Procedural
Hearing on Cross-Examination Scope and Lifestyle Evidence

The court allowed the government to probe Holmes's testimony about agency in her relationship with Balwani while drawing a boundary against irrelevant extravagance evidence and deferring itinerary-specific admissibility.

Highlights

2. Elizabeth A. Holmes — Cross (Continued)

The prosecution questioned Elizabeth Holmes about Theranos's response to critical reporting, her authority over the company, device use, marketing materials, and finances before the Walgreens launch.

Cross
Elizabeth A. HolmesRobert S. Leach
3179 lines

Holmes's cross-examination covered Theranos's response to critical reporting and whistleblowers, her control of the company, limits on Theranos devices, and Balwani's influence. She acknowledged major mistakes in the Wall Street Journal response, extensive reliance on commercial equipment, and problems with pharmaceutical-branded reports while disputing retaliation and several prosecutorial characterizations.

Highlights

Elizabeth A. Holmes — CrossadmissionHolmes acknowledged that Erika Cheung's concerns were vindicated in a way, said she wished Theranos had treated and listened to Cheung differently, and confirmed that Theranos retained David Boies's firm to serve her with a subpoena. Holmes later said she mishandled the entire Wall Street Journal reporting process.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Cross“100 PERCENT. I THINK I MISHANDLED THE ENTIRE PROCESS OF "THE WALL STREET JOURNAL" REPORTING.”— Elizabeth A. HolmesHolmes accepted personal fault for Theranos's response to the Wall Street Journal reporting process.Elizabeth A. Holmes — CrossadmissionHolmes accepted broad responsibility and control as Theranos's founder, chief executive, majority voting shareholder, and supervisor of Balwani and laboratory leadership, agreeing that she could remove board members and senior personnel and that the company ultimately led back to her.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Crosstestimony highlightHolmes confirmed that the MiniLab and 4 Series were never used for patient testing, that the Edison 3.5 was used for 12 California laboratory assays, and that most of Theranos's broader test menu ran on commercial equipment. She also acknowledged that her later public description of Edison was incomplete and something she wished she had handled differently.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Cross“IT WAS TOO DEEP IN THE WEEDS. IT WAS HOW I WAS THINKING ABOUT WHAT THE EDISON WAS, BUT, OF COURSE WE WERE USING THE 3.5 IN THE CLINICAL LAB.”— Elizabeth A. HolmesHolmes acknowledged that her public description of Edison omitted the continuing clinical use of the Edison 3.5 during 2015.Elizabeth A. Holmes — CrossimpeachmentCross-examination compared legal warnings about substantiating claims with later investor presentations using superlatives, then examined Theranos-prepared reports bearing Pfizer, Schering-Plough, and GSK logos. Holmes acknowledged applying logos, altering portions of reports, not reviewing contractual restrictions, and wishing the reports had been clearly identified as Theranos-written.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Crosstestimony highlightCash records showed an $18.5 million refund shortly before the Walgreens launch, a cash balance near $14.46 million, and roughly $22 million in new investment proceeds. Holmes agreed that the refund put pressure on Theranos and that the company was raising money while teams were working to validate assays, though she rejected counsel's characterization that Theranos was almost out of money.

3. Continued Hearing on Defense Motion 1163

The court continued its hearing on Defense Motion 1163, addressing jury-instruction scheduling, Balwani's unavailability, and disputed exhibits and deposition excerpts.

Procedural
Continued Hearing on Defense Motion 1163
180 lines

The court found Balwani unavailable to testify, excluded one cumulative deposition excerpt, indicated that limited portions of other excerpts might be admitted, and admitted Defense Exhibit 14259.

Highlights

← Day 39Federal Criminal TrialDay 41 →