Skip to content
Federal Criminal Trialtrial-daytrial-dayKevin M. DowneyElizabeth A. HolmesdirectDay 39 - November 29, 2021Holmes testified about Theranos’s military claims, laboratory oversight, her relationship with Balwani, and her unsold equity. The court deferred evidentiary motions concerning Balwani’s SEC testimony and a patient-results email.
← Day 38Federal Criminal TrialDay 40 →

Day 39 - November 29, 2021

Holmes Addresses Theranos Operations, Balwani Relationship, and Her Equity

Judge Edward J. Davila
2Proceedings
2Pages
1Witnesses
2,369Lines
Day 39 of 51
Appearing:

Holmes testified about Theranos’s military claims, laboratory oversight, her relationship with Balwani, and her unsold equity. The court deferred evidentiary motions concerning Balwani’s SEC testimony and a patient-results email.

Full day summary

In motion hearings, the defense sought to introduce excerpts from Ramesh Balwani’s SEC deposition and renewed its request to admit an email concerning patient test results. The court questioned whether Balwani’s unavailability had been adequately established, examined the parties’ hearsay and completeness arguments, and deferred both matters without issuing a ruling. On direct examination, Elizabeth Holmes testified about Theranos’s retail, military, demonstration, and laboratory work. She acknowledged that no Theranos device was tested in Afghanistan or used for clinical care on Medevac flights. She described no-sample demonstrations using the null protocol, said she relied on Daniel Young’s investigation of Tyler Shultz’s concerns, and contrasted earlier favorable inspection reports with problems identified during the 2015 CMS inspection. Holmes also testified that she was raped at Stanford and alleged that Balwani later controlled, isolated, and sexually assaulted her during their relationship. She nevertheless denied that he forced her statements to investors or journalists or controlled her dealings with Walgreens, Safeway, or the Theranos board, while saying his influence affected her in ways she did not fully understand. The court admitted Theranos’s FDA submission only as evidence of Holmes’s state of mind and intent, not for the truth of its technical assertions. Holmes said her shares were worth about $4.5 billion on paper in 2014, that she never sold them because she believed in the company, and that they later became worthless. After the testimony, the court said the null-protocol portion of the request to admit Balwani’s SEC testimony appeared moot. The defense agreed to review the issue overnight, and further discussion was deferred until the next morning.

1. Sunny Balwani Prior Testimony and Exhibit 14259 Motions

Before the jury entered, the parties argued over admitting portions of Ramesh Balwani's SEC deposition and a May 2015 email about patient test results. The court examined hearsay, context, and witness-foundation issues but issued no ruling.

Procedural
Hearing on Admission of Sunny Balwani’s Prior Testimony
196 lines

The defense sought to admit selected SEC deposition testimony from Ramesh Balwani under two Rule 804 exceptions. The government opposed admission, and the court probed unavailability, self-inculpatory character, corroboration, SEC-DOJ alignment, completeness, and the lack of prosecution cross-examination without announcing a ruling.

Procedural
Hearing on Renewed Motion to Admit Exhibit 14259

The defense renewed its request to admit the E.T. test-results email as a business record. The government raised embedded-hearsay and foundation concerns, and the court deferred a ruling while considering redaction and further review.

Highlights

2. Elizabeth A. Holmes — Direct (Continued)

Elizabeth Holmes resumed direct examination about Theranos's military proposals, demonstrations, laboratory oversight, her relationship with Ramesh Balwani, and her decision not to sell her company shares. The court later deferred discussion of prior SEC testimony and confirmed the admission of the Shultz letter.

Direct
Elizabeth A. HolmesKevin M. Downey
2089 lines

Holmes described Theranos's military projects, demonstrations, laboratory oversight, and regulatory history before giving emotional testimony alleging coercion and sexual abuse by Ramesh Balwani. She denied that Balwani forced her investor or press statements, addressed the 2015 CMS failures and later remediation, and said she never sold her Theranos shares.

Procedural
Post-Testimony Discussion of Balwani Prior-Testimony Motion

The court tentatively viewed the null-protocol portion of the defense's SEC-testimony request as moot after Holmes's testimony and deferred further discussion. It also confirmed that the Shultz letter, Exhibit 15035, had been admitted.

Highlights

Elizabeth A. Holmes — DirectadmissionHolmes described proposed CENTCOM and SOCOM projects but acknowledged that no Theranos device was tested in Afghanistan and none was used for clinical care on Medevac flights.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Directtestimony highlightHolmes testified that she directed Daniel Young to investigate Tyler Shultz's concerns and accepted Young's explanation after he reported consultation with regulatory personnel and laboratory leadership.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Direct“I THINK WE WERE TOO AGGRESSIVE. I THINK WE WERE SO FOCUSSED ON TRYING TO PROTECT THESE INVENTIONS AND TRADE SECRETS THAT WE LOST SIGHT OF THE BIG PICTURE, AND IN TRYING TO PROTECT THE TRADE SECRETS CREATED ALL SORTS OF IMPRESSIONS ABOUT THERANOS THAT WERE INCORRECT.”— Elizabeth A. HolmesHolmes acknowledged that Theranos's response to impending negative coverage was overly aggressive and counterproductive.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Directemotional momentHolmes testified that she was raped at Stanford and then described an intimate relationship in which Balwani allegedly criticized, controlled, isolated, and sexually assaulted her. Contemporaneous notes and text messages were admitted during this testimony.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Direct“YES. HE WOULD GET VERY ANGRY WITH ME, AND THEN HE WOULD SOMETIMES COME UPSTAIRS TO OUR BEDROOM AND HE WOULD FORCE ME TO HAVE SEX WITH HIM WHEN I DIDN'T WANT TO BECAUSE HE WOULD SAY THAT HE WANTED ME TO KNOW THAT HE STILL LOVED ME.”— Elizabeth A. HolmesHolmes gave direct testimony alleging sexual abuse by Balwani within their relationship.Elizabeth A. Holmes — DirectadmissionHolmes expressly denied that Balwani forced her statements to investors or journalists or controlled her dealings with Walgreens, Safeway, or the board, while saying his influence affected everything about who she was.Elizabeth A. Holmes — Direct“I DON'T KNOW. HE IMPACTED EVERYTHING ABOUT WHO I WAS, AND I DON'T FULLY UNDERSTAND THAT.”— Elizabeth A. HolmesHolmes described Balwani's influence broadly while declining to give a precise account of how it affected her work.Elizabeth A. Holmes — DirectrulingThe court admitted the lengthy FDA submission only for its effect on Holmes's state of mind and intent, not for the truth of its technical assertions.Elizabeth A. Holmes — DirectadmissionHolmes testified that her Theranos holdings were worth about $4.5 billion on paper in 2014, but that she never sold a share because she believed in the company; she said the shares later had no value.Post-Testimony Discussion of Balwani Prior-Testimony Motionprocedural actionAfter Holmes's afternoon testimony about the null protocol, the court said the related portion of the defense request to admit SEC investigative testimony appeared moot. The defense agreed to review the issue overnight, the government reiterated its cumulative-evidence argument, and the court deferred further discussion until the next morning.
← Day 38Federal Criminal TrialDay 40 →