Elizabeth A. Holmes — Direct
609 linesDIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: (HANDING.) MS. HOLMES, WILL YOU CONFIRM FOR US THAT YOU ARE VACCINATED SO YOU MIGHT REMOVE YOUR MASK IF YOU PREFER?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I AM VACCINATED, YES.
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU FOUND THERANOS?
MR. DOWNEY: HOW LONG DID YOU WORK THERE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WORKED THERE FROM 2004 TO 2018.
MR. DOWNEY: WHILE YOU WERE THERE, DID YOU BELIEVE THAT THERANOS DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGY THAT WAS CAPABLE OF RUNNING ANY BLOOD TEST?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: EXPLAIN THAT.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: WE WORKED FOR YEARS WITH TEAMS OF SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS TO MINIATURIZE ALL OF THE TECHNOLOGIES IN A LABORATORY. THE CORE PART OF THAT WAS A FORMULA FOR BEING ABLE TO RUN TESTS ON SMALL SAMPLES AND RUN THAT FORMULA. WE MINIATURIZED THE TOOLS IN A LAB, LIKE A CENTRIFUGE OR A MICROSCOPE, TO EXECUTE IT. BY 2009, 2010, WE HAD A BREAKTHROUGH IN WHICH WE FIGURED OUT HOW TO APPLY THE FORMULA NOT JUST TO ONE METHOD OF TESTS, BUT TO FOUR. AND ACROSS THOSE FOUR METHODS WE COULD RUN ANY TEST.
MR. DOWNEY: AND IS IT THAT WORK THAT LED YOU TO CONCLUDE THAT THE COMPANY WAS CAPABLE OF PERFORMING ANY BLOOD TEST ESSENTIALLY?
MR. DOWNEY: HOW MANY SMALL SAMPLE ASSAYS DID THERANOS DEVELOP AND VALIDATE IN ITS RESEARCH LABORATORY WHILE YOU WERE AT THE COMPANY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OVER 300.
MR. DOWNEY: HOW MANY SMALL -- AND DO YOU KNOW THAT THERE WAS A TIME THAT THERANOS OPERATED A CLINICAL LABORATORY OFFERING BLOOD TESTING SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC?
MR. DOWNEY: HOW MANY SMALL SAMPLE ASSAYS DID THERANOS OFFER IN ITS CLINICAL LABORATORY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OVER 70 OR SO.
MR. DOWNEY: HOW MANY OF THOSE ASSAYS WERE OFFERED WHERE THE ANALYSIS WAS PERFORMED ON A MINIATURIZED THERANOS DEVICE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: TWELVE.
MR. DOWNEY: WHEN YOU SPOKE PUBLICLY ABOUT THE CAPABILITIES OF THERANOS'S TECHNOLOGY, WERE YOU ALWAYS LIMITING YOUR COMMENTS TO WHAT WAS AVAILABLE IN THERANOS'S CLINICAL LAB?
MR. DOWNEY: I'D LIKE TO TAKE A STEP BACK AND ASK YOU ABOUT YOUR BACKGROUND. WHEN WERE YOU BORN?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS BORN ON FEBRUARY 3RD, 1984.
MR. DOWNEY: WHERE WERE YOU BORN?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IN WASHINGTON, DC.
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU GROW UP THERE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID FOR A FEW YEARS. I MOVED TO CALIFORNIA. I MOVED BACK TO DC AND THEN TO HOUSTON, TEXAS.
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU GO TO HIGH SCHOOL IN HOUSTON?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU ATTEND COLLEGE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: FIRST YEAR AND A HALF.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHERE DID YOU ATTEND COLLEGE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WENT TO STANFORD UNIVERSITY.
MR. DOWNEY: SO TELL US, IN YOUR FRESHMAN YEAR AT STANFORD, WHAT DID YOU STUDY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS STUDYING CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND STARTING TO EXPLORE ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING.
MR. DOWNEY: DURING YOUR FIRST YEAR AT STANFORD, DID YOU MEET A PROFESSOR NAMED CHANNING ROBERTSON?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO WAS DR. ROBERTSON AT THAT TIME?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I THINK HE WAS THE CHAIR OF THE CHEMICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT THAT TIME AND A CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROFESSOR WHO HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN A LOT OF COMPANIES IN THE LIFE SCIENCE SPACE.
MR. DOWNEY: AND HOW DID YOU COME TO MEET DR. ROBERTSON?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: WHEN I GOT TO STANFORD, I WENT THROUGH THE HANDBOOK OF PROFESSORS LOOKING FOR EVERY PROFESSOR WHO WAS INVOLVED IN BOTH HEALTH TECHNOLOGY, AS WELL AS TRADITIONAL TECHNOLOGY, AND THERE WAS ONLY THREE OR SO OF THEM, SO I SHOWED UP AT HIS OFFICE AND ASKED IF I COULD TAKE HIS CLASS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU TAKE HIS CLASS?
MR. DOWNEY: OUTSIDE OF CLASS, DID PROFESSOR ROBERTSON ALSO HAVE A RESEARCH LABORATORY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU COME TO WORK IN THAT RESEARCH LABORATORY DURING YOUR FIRST YEAR AT STANFORD?
MR. DOWNEY: WHO WORKED WITH YOU IN THAT RESEARCH LABORATORY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: SEVERAL OF DR. ROBERTSON'S STUDENTS. I WORKED FOR DR. SHAUNAK ROY.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT KIND OF WORK DID YOU DO IN THAT RESEARCH LABORATORY DURING YOUR FRESHMAN YEAR AT STANFORD?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WORKED ON WHAT IS CALLED MICROFLUIDICS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT ARE MICROFLUIDICS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT'S THE HANDLING OF VERY SMALL VOLUMES OF FLUID, SO HOW THEY MOVE AND HOW TO PROCESS THEM.
MR. DOWNEY: AND AFTER YOUR FIRST YEAR AT STANFORD, DID YOU CONTINUE TO WORK IN THE SUMMER DURING OR AROUND THE SUBJECTS OF ENGINEERING?
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHERE DID YOU WORK?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WORKED AT THE GENOME INSTITUTE IN SINGAPORE.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT IS THE GENOME INSTITUTE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT IS THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE THAT STUDIES THE HUMAN GENOME, SO DNA, MEDICINES THAT CAN AFFECT IT, AND TESTS BASED ON GENETICS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT DID YOU DO WHEN YOU WERE WORKING AT THE GENOME INSTITUTE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS A RESEARCHER WORKING ON WHAT IS CALLED A MICROARRAY, WHICH IS A TEST SYSTEM FOR THE DETECTION OF THE SARS VIRUS.
MR. DOWNEY: CAN YOU REMIND US WHAT THE SARS VIRUS WAS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES. IT WAS A PRECURSOR TO COVID IN SOME WAYS. IT WAS AN INFLUENZA-LIKE VIRUS THAT WAS BREAKING OUT AT THAT TIME.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHILE YOU WERE WORKING AT THE GENOME INSTITUTE, DID YOU COME TO DEVELOP A MENTOR AT THE GENOME INSTITUTE AS WELL?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO WAS THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: DR. EDISON LIU.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO WAS DR. EDISON LIU AS OF -- WHAT YEAR WAS THIS APPROXIMATELY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THIS WAS 2003.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO WAS DR. EDISON LIU AS OF 2003?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE WAS A RESEARCHER IN THE BREAST CANCER SPACE. HE HAD BEEN A LEADER AT THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, AND HE HAD COME TO SINGAPORE TO RUN THE GENOME INSTITUTE IN SINGAPORE.
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, IN YOUR TIME WORKING AT THE GENOME INSTITUTE, DID YOU BEGIN TO, TO DEVELOP AN IDEA THAT LED YOU TO FILE A PATENT APPLICATION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND IS THE INVENTION THAT WAS THE SUBJECT OF THAT PATENT APPLICATION SOMETHING THAT ULTIMATELY FORMED PART OF THE BASIS OF THE TECHNOLOGIES THAT WERE USED AT THERANOS?
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU WORK ON THAT PATENT APPLICATION WHILE YOU WERE AT THE GENOME INSTITUTE OR AFTER YOU RETURNED?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: BOTH.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. NOW, TELL US BEFORE -- I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT WHAT IDEA IT IS THAT YOU HAD, BUT BEFORE I DO THAT, CAN YOU TELL US WHAT WAS HAPPENING IN YOUR HEAD THAT GENERATED THE IDEA THAT YOU MIGHT FILE A PATENT APPLICATION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I HAD BEEN WORKING AT STANFORD ON THE HANDLING OF SMALL VOLUMES OF FLUID. I HAD BEEN WORKING IN SINGAPORE ON THESE MICROARRAY MACHINES, WHICH ARE BIG DIAGNOSTIC MACHINES, AND I HAD ALSO HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOME RESEARCH ON DRUG DELIVERY TECHNOLOGIES. AND I THOUGHT I COULD COMBINE THEM AND MINIATURIZE SOME OF THE TECHNOLOGY THAT I HAD SEEN IN THE LAB IN SINGAPORE.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU THINK OF A PARTICULAR INVENTION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT WAS THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I THOUGHT ABOUT MINIATURIZING THOSE TECHNOLOGIES TO THE POINT THAT THEY COULD BE PUT IN A PILL THAT SOMEONE COULD SWALLOW AND DO TESTING THROUGH THE PILL WHILE IT'S GOING THROUGH YOUR BODY, OR IN A PATCH THAT SOMEONE COULD WEAR.
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU DISCUSS THE IDEA THAT YOU WERE CONSIDERING WITH ANYONE IN SINGAPORE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WITH WHOM DID YOU DISCUSS IT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DISCUSSED IT WITH DR. LIU.
MR. DOWNEY: AND TELL US ABOUT THAT CONVERSATION.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: DR. LIU WAS VERY ENCOURAGING. HE WAS EXCITED ABOUT THE IDEA. HE THOUGHT IT WAS POSSIBLE AND ENCOURAGED ME TO PURSUE IT.
MR. DOWNEY: AND AT THE TIME THAT YOU WERE FILING THIS PATENT APPLICATION, WERE THERE ANY TECHNOLOGIES THAT EXISTED THAT ALLOWED SOMEONE AT THE POINT OF THE BODY TO RECEIVE AN IMMEDIATE DIAGNOSIS, OR A READING OF THEIR BLOOD OR OTHER BODILY FLUID?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: NOT THAT I KNEW OF IN THE SAME WAY. THERE WAS GLUCOSE METERS THAT COULD DO GLUCOSE TESTING, OR CHOLESTEROL METERS THAT COULD DO CHOLESTEROL TESTING. THESE ARE MOSTLY TECHNOLOGIES FOR A SINGLE OR A FEW TESTS. BUT THEY WEREN'T INGESTIBLES OR WEARABLES.
MR. DOWNEY: WHEN YOU RETURNED FROM SINGAPORE, DID YOU WORK ON THAT PATENT APPLICATION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHERE DID YOU DO THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: AT MY PARENTS' HOME IN HOUSTON.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU ULTIMATELY FILE THAT PATENT APPLICATION?
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT EXHIBIT 7051. THAT SHOULD BE IN YOUR NOTEBOOK NEXT TO A TAB THAT SAYS 7051.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OH. OKAY.
MR. DOWNEY: AND JUST TAKE A MOMENT TO LOOK AT THAT. AND CAN YOU TELL US, IS THIS THE PATENT APPLICATION THAT YOU FILED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2003?
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 7051.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED. IT MAY BE PUBLISHED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 7051 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, AT THE TIME THAT YOU -- LET'S GET THE DATE FOR WHEN YOU FILED THIS APPLICATION. DID YOU FILE THIS IN SEPTEMBER OF 2003?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND AT THE TIME THAT YOU FILED IT, DID YOU HAVE A PROTOTYPE OF AN ACTUAL PILL OR PATCH THAT YOU WERE SEEKING A PATENT ON?
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID THE APPLICATION THAT YOU FILED DESCRIBE THE INVENTION THAT REFLECTED THE IDEA THAT YOU HAD?
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT PAGE 30 WITHIN EXHIBIT 7051. AND WE CAN PUT THAT UP ON THE SCREEN. I'D ASK YOU JUST TO EXPLAIN FROM THIS -- THIS IS A DIAGRAM THAT WAS CONTAINED WITHIN YOUR PATENT APPLICATION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT IS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DOES THIS DIAGRAM REFLECT THE INVENTIONS THAT YOU WERE FILING AN APPLICATION ON?
MR. DOWNEY: AND TAKING -- USING THIS DIAGRAM, CAN YOU EXPLAIN THE IDEA FOR THE INVENTION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES. AND IT SOUNDS LIKE I CAN'T POINT. NO? OKAY.
JUDGE DAVILA: I DON'T THINK IT'S WORKING. IS THIS OPERATIONAL, MS. KRATZMANN? THE TOUCH SCREEN?
COURT CLERK: NO, THAT FEATURE IS NOT WORKING, YOUR HONOR.
MR. DOWNEY: WELL, MAYBE I CAN ASK MR. BENNETT TO HIGHLIGHT THE RELEVANT PORTIONS AS SHE DISCUSSES THEM.
MR. DOWNEY: SO WHERE ON THIS DIAGRAM SHOULD WE START TO UNDERSTAND THE INVENTION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YEAH. SO START AT THE TOP. SO FIRST OF ALL, THIS IS A PILL.
MR. DOWNEY: IS THAT WITH THE CIRCULAR PART ON THE TOP?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES, IT'S THE CIRCULAR PART ON THE TOP.
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME JUST ASK MR. BENNETT TO HIGHLIGHT THAT SO WE --
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: AND WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS A PILL THAT COULD BE SWALLOWED WHERE FLUID COULD FLOW IN AND OUT OF THE PILL AS IT GOES THROUGH THE BODY. SO THE IDEA WAS THOSE LITTLE HOLES THAT ARE CALLED MEMBRANES WOULD ALLOW FLUID TO MOVE IN, RUN OVER THOSE BEADS, WHICH ARE SENSORS, TO REACT --
MR. DOWNEY: ARE THE BEADS THE BLACK DOTS UNDERNEATH?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: EXACTLY.
MR. DOWNEY: I INTERRUPTED YOU. I'M SORRY. WHAT ARE THE SENSORS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THE BEADS THEMSELVES ARE SENSORS. SO THERE'S CHEMISTRY THERE THAT WOULD INTERACT WITH THE SAMPLE, AND THE SAMPLE WOULD FLOW OUT THE OTHER SIDE. WHEN THE CHEMISTRY INTERACTED WITH THE SAMPLE, IT WOULD RUN A TEST. AND THE SIGNAL, OR THE DATA FROM THAT TEST WOULD BE TRANSFERRED WIRELESSLY TO SOME TYPE OF HANDHELD DEVICE WHERE PROCESSING OF THAT DATA WOULD BE DONE, AND THEN INFORMATION WOULD BE TRANSFERRED BACK TO THE PILL WHICH HAD DRUGS LOADED INTO THOSE LITTLE RESERVOIRS OR CHANNELS.
MR. DOWNEY: ARE THEY THE FLAT LINES IN THE -- NEXT TO NUMBER 10 AND 11?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: EXACTLY, YES. AND THE IDEA WAS THAT THE DRUG COULD BE RELEASED BASED ON WHAT IS MEASURED IN THE BODY. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU WERE SICK WITH AN INFECTION, THE PILL COULD PICK IT UP AND DELIVER A MEDICATION, LIKE AN ANTIBIOTIC, IN REALTIME.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU GET THIS APPLICATION FOR A PATENT ON FILE BEFORE YOU RETURNED TO YOUR SOPHOMORE YEAR AT STANFORD?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: WHEN YOU RETURNED TO STANFORD, DID YOU DISCUSS WITH PROFESSOR ROBERTSON THE IDEA OF THE PATENT AND THE PATENT APPLICATION THAT YOU FILED?
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT WAS HIS REACTION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I THINK HE WAS A BIT SKEPTICAL AT FIRST. I GAVE HIM A COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL APPLICATION. HE READ IT. HE SAID IT WAS SOMETHING THAT HAD NOT BEEN DONE BEFORE, AND HE ENCOURAGED ME TO CONTINUE MY RESEARCH.
MR. DOWNEY: DURING YOUR SOPHOMORE YEAR, DID YOU CONTINUE TO WORK IN DR. ROBERTSON'S RESEARCH LABORATORY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU CONTINUE TO WORK ON MICROFLUIDICS?
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU ALSO BEGIN TO DO INDEPENDENT RESEARCH AT STANFORD IN THE AREAS OF MICROFLUIDICS AND NANO FABRICATION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND TELL US WHAT NANO FABRICATION IS.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT'S LITERALLY THE FABRICATION OR THE MAKING OF NANO SCALE TECHNOLOGY, SO VERY SMALL TECHNOLOGIES, OFTEN CHIPS, LIKE SILICON CHIPS, THAT CAN BE BUILT IN A FAB.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WERE BOTH OF THOSE DISCIPLINES RELEVANT TO THE INVENTION ON WHICH YOU FILED A PATENT APPLICATION?
MR. DOWNEY: HOW MUCH TIME DID YOU SPEND WORKING IN -- BETWEEN THE INDEPENDENT RESEARCH AND YOUR WORK IN DR. ROBERTSON'S RESEARCH LABORATORY, HOW MUCH TIME DID YOU SPEND ON THAT RELATIVE TO YOUR CLASS WORK?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I SPENT ALMOST ALL OF MY TIME ON THAT.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. DID THAT ULTIMATELY CAUSE YOU -- IS THAT ONE OF THE REASONS THAT YOU DECIDED TO LEAVE STANFORD UNIVERSITY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS, YES.
MR. DOWNEY: WHEN DID YOU ACTUALLY END UP LEAVING STANFORD AS A STUDENT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I LEFT IN MARCH OF 2004.
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU HAVE ANY CONVERSATIONS WITH PROFESSOR ROBERTSON ABOUT YOUR DECISION TO LEAVE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND TELL US ABOUT THAT CONVERSATION.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I TOLD HIM I WANTED TO TAKE A LEAVE OF ABSENCE. HE EXPRESSED SOME CONCERN ABOUT ME NOT FINISHING COLLEGE, BUT I WAS ALWAYS ABLE TO GO BACK. AND HE ULTIMATELY WAS SUPPORTIVE AND SAID HE WOULD HELP ME BUILD.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHEN YOU HAD THE PATENT APPLICATION ON FILE, WAS THE NEXT STEP TO TRY TO BUILD A PROTOTYPE OF THE INVENTION?
MR. DOWNEY: IS THAT WHAT YOU BEGAN TO DO AFTER YOU LEFT STANFORD?
MR. DOWNEY: AND TELL US ABOUT HOW YOU DID THAT. DID YOU START THE COMPANY, OR DID YOU DO IT ON YOUR OWN AT FIRST?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS DOING IT ON MY OWN. I DID THEN START A COMPANY AND TRIED TO RAISE THE MONEY TO GET A LAB AND TO BE ABLE TO HIRE SCIENTISTS TO WORK WITH TO BUILD.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND TELL US ABOUT JUST THE FIRST FEW MONTHS OF THAT COMPANY'S -- FIRST OF ALL, WHAT WAS THAT COMPANY CALLED?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I CALLED IT REAL-TIME CURES.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND THEN LATER HOW DID IT COME TO BE CALLED THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: CHANGED THE NAME TO THERANOS.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND WHEN WAS THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IN 2005, I THINK.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. SO LET'S TALK ABOUT THE EARLY PART OF THE COMPANY WHEN IT WAS STILL REAL-TIME CURES. WHAT -- OTHER THAN BUILDING THE TEAM AND TRYING TO FIND SPACE FOR A LAB, WHAT ELSE WERE YOU DOING WITH RESPECT TO THE PRODUCT OR THE INVENTION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: WE, WE WERE PROTOTYPING. SO WE WERE TRYING TO BUILD THE COMPONENTS OF THE TECHNOLOGY IN THIS LITTLE LAB THAT WE ULTIMATELY GOT SET UP.
MR. DOWNEY: YOU MENTIONED YOU WERE TRYING TO HIRE EMPLOYEES. WERE YOU ULTIMATELY ABLE TO HIRE SOME EMPLOYEES TO WORK WITH YOU ON IT?
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO WERE THEY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO HIRE SOME OF THE PEOPLE THAT I WAS WORKING FOR AND WITH AT STANFORD, TWO OF DR. ROBERTSON'S STUDENTS AND TWO PEOPLE THAT I HAD MET IN THE FAB, THE FABRICATION FACILITY, WHO HAD WORKED AT I.B.M. FOR A LONG TIME.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID DR. ROBERTSON HAVE ANY ROLE WITH REGARD TO THE NEW COMPANY, REAL-TIME CURES?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT ROLE DID HE HAVE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE BECAME OUR FIRST BOARD MEMBER.
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, DID THERE COME A TIME WHEN YOU -- I BELIEVE YOU SAID YOU HAD FILED A PATENT APPLICATION IN 2003; IS THAT RIGHT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WAS THAT AN APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PATENT OR WAS IT WHAT IS KNOWN AS A PROVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATION?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT WAS A PROVISIONAL PATENT.
MR. DOWNEY: AND CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT THAT MEANS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT'S THE VERY FIRST STEP IN THE PATENT PROCESS WHERE YOU PUT YOUR IDEA ON FILE TO MARK THE DATE OF THE INVENTION.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. DID YOU ULTIMATELY -- WERE YOU ULTIMATELY SUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING A PATENT ON THE APPLICATION THAT YOU FILED IN 2003 BEFORE YOUR SOPHOMORE YEAR AT STANFORD?
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT EXHIBIT 9501.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OKAY.
MR. DOWNEY: CAN YOU TELL US WHAT THIS IS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THIS IS THE ACTUAL PATENT THAT WAS ISSUED ON THAT IDEA.
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE TO ADMIT 9501.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED. IT MAY BE PUBLISHED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 9501 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: I'D LIKE TO JUST HIGHLIGHT THE FIRST PAGE OF THIS PATENT. WHEN WAS THIS GRANTED?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT WAS GRANTED ON NOVEMBER 6TH OF 2007.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND DO YOU SEE ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE THERE'S AN ITEM, INVENTORS, AND THEN THERE'S YOUR NAME AND SOME OTHERS?
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHY ARE THE OTHERS LISTED AS INVENTORS ON THE PATENT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: BECAUSE THEY CAME UP WITH SOME OF THE KEY IDEAS IN DEVELOPING THE PROTOTYPE.
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, YOU WERE ULTIMATELY ABLE TO BUILD A PROTOTYPE?
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHEN DID THAT HAPPEN?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: STARTING IN 2004 AND OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEAR.
MR. DOWNEY: ABOUT A YEAR AFTER YOU FILED THE APPLICATION?
MR. DOWNEY: AND ONCE YOU HAD A PROTOTYPE, DID YOU BEGIN TO START TO THINK ABOUT HOW YOU MIGHT TURN THIS INVENTION INTO SOME KIND OF A PRODUCT THAT MIGHT BE USED BY SOMEONE WHO MIGHT PAY YOU MONEY FOR IT?
MR. DOWNEY: TELL US ABOUT THAT PROCESS.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I KNEW A PROFESSOR AT STANFORD WHO HAD AN ENTREPRENEURSHIP CLASS AND HE SAID I COULD WORK WITH HIS CLASS ON A PROJECT TO COME UP WITH A BUSINESS PLAN, AND I DID THAT.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WERE YOU ULTIMATELY ABLE TO COME UP WITH A BUSINESS PLAN FOR THE INVENTION?
MR. DOWNEY: AND TELL US ABOUT THAT BUSINESS PLAN.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THE BUSINESS PLAN FOCUSSED ON INTRODUCING OUR TECHNOLOGY TO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES FOR USE IN CLINICAL TRIALS WHERE WE COULD DEVELOP A LIBRARY OF TESTS AND TRY TO HELP PHARMA COMPANIES GET DRUGS TO MARKET FASTER.
MR. DOWNEY: WE'VE HEARD SOME TESTIMONY IN THE CASE ABOUT CLINICAL TRIALS AND PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES. IS THIS PERIOD OF 2004 REALLY THE FIRST TIME THAT YOU STARTED WORKING ON A PRODUCT THAT COULD BE USED BY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES?
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, WITH THE BUSINESS PLAN IN MIND, DID YOU GO ABOUT TRYING TO INTEREST PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID, YES.
MR. DOWNEY: AND TELL US ABOUT THAT.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I MET WITH EVERYONE I COULD WHO KNEW SOMEONE WHO WORKED IN PHARMA OR WAS IN PHARMA TO TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY DID AND WHAT THEY WOULD BE INTERESTED IN.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. LET ME SHOW YOU EXHIBIT 15015.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OKAY.
MR. DOWNEY: TAKE A MOMENT TO REVIEW THAT.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OKAY.
MR. DOWNEY: WHO IS -- DO YOU KNOW WHO THE RECIPIENT OF THIS EMAIL IS, TOW CHONG?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DO GENERALLY, YES.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO IS HE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I BELIEVE HE EITHER LED OR WAS ONE OF THE LEADERS AT A RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN SINGAPORE.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO -- AND YOU SENT HIM THIS EMAIL IN CONNECTION WITH YOUR EFFORTS TO OBTAIN PHARMACEUTICAL BUSINESS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I THINK THIS IS AN EMAIL FROM DR. LIU TO HIM TO FACILITATE AN INTRODUCTION SO I COULD TALK TO HIM ABOUT THAT AND BUILDING OUR PRODUCT.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 15015.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 15015 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: IF WE CAN JUST SHOW THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF 15015. SO AS YOU SAID HERE, DR. LIU IS WRITING TO TOW CHONG -- AND JUST AS A REMINDER, DR. LIU WAS THE MENTOR THAT YOU HAD DEVELOPED WHILE YOU WERE IN SINGAPORE?
MR. DOWNEY: AND IS WHAT IS REFLECTED IN THIS EMAIL AN EXAMPLE OF YOU REACHING OUT TO EVERYONE YOU KNEW TO SEE IF YOU COULD FIND A WAY TO GET SOME ENTRE TO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES?
MR. DOWNEY: AND HOW MUCH WORK DID YOU DO DOING THAT KIND OF EFFORT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I STARTED WORKING ALL OF THE TIME. I WAS, I WAS TALKING TO MY FAMILY, TALKING TO THEIR FRIENDS, TALKING TO PEOPLE I HAD KNOWN AT STANFORD, TRYING TO MEET PEOPLE WHO COULD HELP ME BUILD THIS.
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, IN THE FIRST YEAR OR SO OF THE COMPANY, HOW DID YOU GO ABOUT FINANCING WORK ON THE TECHNOLOGY, YOUR EMPLOYEES, AN OFFICE AND SO FORTH? HOW DID YOU DO THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I STARTED WITH TALKING TO MY PARENTS, AND THEY LET ME TAKE THE MONEY THAT THEY HAD SAVED FOR ME TO BE ABLE TO GO TO COLLEGE TO WORK ON MY PATENT. AND THEN I WENT TO TRY TO RAISE OR BORROW MONEY.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND WERE YOU ABLE TO BORROW MONEY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND WERE YOU ABLE TO RAISE ENOUGH MONEY THROUGH THOSE KIND OF STEPS TO KEEP THE COMPANY GOING?
MR. DOWNEY: I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT ONCE YOU HAD A PROTOTYPE AND TRYING TO DEVELOP IT INTO A PRODUCT. DID YOU STRUCTURE THE COMPANY TO TRY TO BUILD AN ACTUAL PRODUCT OUT OF THE, OUT OF THE PROTOTYPE THAT YOU HAD?
MR. DOWNEY: HOW DID YOU STRUCTURE THE COMPANY TO TRY TO DO THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I STRUCTURED IT AROUND THREE CORE AREAS: THE FIRST WAS CHEMISTRY OR THE ASSAYS; THE SECOND WAS HARDWARE; AND THE THIRD WAS SOFTWARE.
MR. DOWNEY: AND CAN YOU JUST REMIND US, WHEN YOU SAY CHEMISTRY OR ASSAYS, ARE THEY SYNONYMS IN YOUR MIND?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THEY ARE, YES.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. EXPLAIN WHY THAT IS AND WHAT THAT IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE JURY, WHO HAS HEARD ABOUT IT BEFORE, BUT JUST EXPLAIN THAT, PLEASE.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES. THE ASSAYS ARE WHAT WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT AS TESTS. ASSAYS IS THE TECHNICAL WORD THAT WE WOULD USE IN OUR LAB TO DESCRIBE THE TESTS. THE CHEMISTRY IS WHAT THE ASSAY ACTUALLY IS. SO IT'S CHEMICALS THAT MAKE UP THE TESTS. SO I SOMETIMES SAY CHEMISTRY OR ASSAY OR TEST.
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, YOU MENTIONED THAT YOU BROKE THE TEAMS INTO A GROUP WORKING ON THE ASSAYS; RIGHT?
MR. DOWNEY: AND A GROUP WORKING ON THE HARDWARE; CORRECT?
MR. DOWNEY: AND A GROUP WORKING ON THE SOFTWARE; CORRECT?
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, AT SOME POINT DID THE -- YOUR IDEA AS TO WHAT THE HARDWARE SHOULD BE CHANGE?
MR. DOWNEY: AND I THINK YOU SAID THAT, IN CONNECTION WITH THE ORIGINAL PATENT APPLICATION, THAT YOU HAD BEEN THINKING ABOUT A PILL THAT WOULD BE SWALLOWED.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS.
MR. DOWNEY: TELL US HOW THE IDEAS ABOUT THE HARDWARE EVOLVED AND WHY THEY EVOLVED?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THE IDEA STARTED WITH THE PILL WITH THE IDEA THAT SOMEONE COULD LITERALLY SWALLOW A TECHNOLOGY LIKE THAT AND NOT HAVE TO TAKE ANY OTHER ACTIONS AND A TEST COULD BE DONE AND A DRUG COULD BE DELIVERED. THAT SAME TECHNOLOGY IDEA EXPANDED TO A PATCH THAT COULD BE WORN AND BLOOD COULD BE MEASURED AND DELIVERED. AS I STARTED TALKING TO PEOPLE ABOUT WHAT COULD BE USEFUL FOR A PHARMACEUTICAL CLINICAL TRIAL, I LEARNED THAT PEOPLE WERE INTERESTED IN A BENCHTOP OR A TABLETOP DEVICE, AND WE MOVED TO TRYING TO BUILD THAT.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND WERE YOU SUCCESSFUL IN BUILDING THAT?
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT EXHIBIT 15026.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OKAY.
MR. DOWNEY: AND IS THIS A PROTOTYPE OF THE DEVICE THAT YOU JUST DESCRIBED?
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 15026.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED. IT MAY BE PUBLISHED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 15026 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: AND CAN YOU, IN BRIEF TERMS, JUST EXPLAIN THIS TECHNOLOGY AND HOW THE VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN MENTIONING, THAT IS, THE SOFTWARE AND THE HARDWARE AND THE ASSAYS, WERE DESIGNED TO WORK ON THIS TECHNOLOGY?
MR. LEACH: YOUR HONOR, I DON'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT. THE IMAGE OF MY 15026 IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS BEING DISPLAYED ON THE SCREEN.
MR. DOWNEY: OH, I BEG YOUR PARDON.
(DISCUSSION AMONGST COUNSEL OFF THE RECORD.)
MR. DOWNEY: HAS THAT BEEN CORRECTED?
MR. LEACH: I NOW HAVE A DIFFERENT COPY, YOUR HONOR. THANK YOU.
MR. DOWNEY: YES. SO I MOVE THAT IN.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED. IT MAY BE PUBLISHED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 15026 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: WOULD YOU MIND REPEATING THE QUESTION JUST SO I CAN --
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: THE QUESTION WAS, CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW THE HARDWARE AND THE SOFTWARE AND THE ASSAYS WERE DESIGNED TO WORK IN CONNECTION WITH THIS PROTOTYPE? EXPLAIN HOW EACH PIECE WORKS.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I CAN. SO WHAT WE DID, IT WAS MOVED FROM SOMETHING LIKE A PATCH WHERE YOU COULD MONITOR AND RUN A CHEMISTRY AND DETECT SOMETHING ALL IN ONE DESIGN TO A NEW IDEA, WHICH IS YOU WOULD HAVE A DISPOSABLE THAT COULD CONTAIN THE CHEMISTRIES THAT YOU MIGHT RUN AND A DEVICE THAT COULD READ THAT DISPOSABLE. THIS IS THE INSIDE OF ONE OF THOSE EARLY DEVICES THAT WOULD RECEIVE WHAT WE CALLED A CARTRIDGE, THE PIECE OF PLASTIC THAT HOLDS THE CHEMISTRY. YOU SEE HERE ARE THESE LITTLE WHITE PUMPS AND VALVES ON TOP --
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME JUST SLOW YOU DOWN THERE. ARE THOSE WHERE THE ARROW IS RIGHT NOW IN THE DISPLAY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THOSE ARE THE VALVES, YEAH, EXACTLY. AND RIGHT ABOVE IT, THE ROUND CIRCULAR TECHNOLOGY IS A PUMP. AND A CARTRIDGE COULD BE INTRODUCED TO THIS DEVICE. THAT PUMP AND THOSE VALVES WOULD ACTIVATE THE CARTRIDGE AND FLUID WOULD START TO MOVE THROUGH THE CARTRIDGE TO RUN A CHEMISTRY. YOU CAN SEE THE ELECTRONICS OR THE BOARD ON THE RIGHT SIDE THAT WOULD CONTROL THAT PROCESS, ANALYZE DATA, AND TRANSMIT IT WIRELESSLY.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. NOW, WE TALKED ABOUT PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND YOUR EFFORTS THERE, AND WE TALKED ABOUT BUILDING THIS PROTOTYPE. DID YOU ULTIMATELY DEVELOP THIS INTO AN ACTUAL PRODUCT?
MR. DOWNEY: AND TO BUILD THAT PRODUCT, DID YOU GO OUT AND TRY TO RAISE SOME ADDITIONAL MONEY TO TRY TO FINANCE THAT RESEARCH AND THE EMPLOYEES AND THE OFFICE AND ALL OF THE THINGS THAT IT TAKES TO RUN A BUSINESS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WAS THAT SERIES OF FUND RAISING CALLED A SERIES B FUND RAISING OF THERANOS?
MR. DOWNEY: AND WE TALKED EARLIER ABOUT THE MONEY THAT YOU RAISED AT THE OUTSET THROUGH LOANS AND SO FORTH AND FROM EARLY INVESTMENTS INTO THE COMPANY. WAS THAT THE SERIES A?
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. SO WITHIN THE SERIES B, DID YOU BEGIN TO TRY TO TALK TO VENTURE CAPITALISTS ABOUT FINANCING THE COMPANY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WAS DON LUCAS, SENIOR ONE OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS?
MR. DOWNEY: WHO WAS DON LUCAS? TELL US ABOUT HIM AS OF 2005 WHEN YOU MET HIM.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: DON LUCAS WAS ONE OF THE EARLY VENTURE CAPITALISTS IN SILICON VALLEY. HE HAD HELPED BUILD A NUMBER OF TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES LIKE ORACLE AND NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR, ADOBE, AND I KNEW HIM AS SOMEONE WHO FOCUSSED ON BUILDING GREAT COMPANIES FOR THE LONG-TERM.
MR. DOWNEY: AND HOW DID YOU COME TO MEET HIM?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS INTRODUCED TO HIM BY SOMEONE WHO HAD GONE TO COLLEGE WITH MY DAD.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU HAVE A PITCH MEETING WITH HIM?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I HAD AN INTRODUCTORY MEETING WITH HIM, YES.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND WHAT WAS HIS REACTION TO YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS YOU WERE TRYING TO BUILD?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS. HE BEGAN A VERY COMPREHENSIVE DILIGENCE PROCESS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT DID THAT DILIGENCE PROCESS CONSIST OF?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT CONSISTED OF GIVING HIM A LOT OF INFORMATION ABOUT OUR PATENTS. HE HIRED A LAW FIRM TO REVIEW OUR PATENTS. HE ASKED US TO GET AN AUDIT OF OUR FINANCIALS. HE WANTED COPIES OF CONTRACTS AND OTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THE BUSINESS. HE WANTED TO SPEAK TO PEOPLE THAT WE WERE TALKING TO AND INTERACTING WITH.
MR. DOWNEY: I WANT TO SHOW YOU EXHIBIT 12027. AND MY QUESTION IN THE FIRST INSTANCE IS JUST WHETHER THIS IS AN EMAIL EXCHANGE BETWEEN YOU AND MR. LUCAS AND OTHERS DURING THE DUE DILIGENCE PROCESS ASSOCIATED WITH HIS INVESTING IN THERANOS?
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 12027.
MR. LEACH: 401, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: INCLUDING ALL OF THE PAGES, MR. DOWNEY?
MR. DOWNEY: WELL, I WAS JUST GOING TO SHOW ONE OF THE PAGES. I'M HAPPY TO EXPLAIN THE RELEVANCE, BUT NOT OUT LOUD.
JUDGE DAVILA: SURE. I UNDERSTAND. YOU WANT TO DISPLAY TO THE WITNESS JUST THIS FIRST PAGE AND SPEAK ON THE FIRST PAGE WITHOUT -- CAN YOU DO THAT WITHOUT THE SECONDARY PAGES?
MR. DOWNEY: SURE. YOUR HONOR, I THINK THAT THERE IS A -- I CAN CERTAINLY DO THAT. I JUST WANTED TO DISPLAY, AND I DON'T HAVE TO ADMIT IT -- BUT I THINK I WILL NEED TO DO THAT TO DISPLAY IT -- JUST AN ATTACHMENT WHICH RELATES TO THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION THAT HE ASKED FOR AND GOT AS PART OF THE DUE DILIGENCE PROCESS WHEN HE WAS LOOKING INTO AN INVESTMENT IN THERANOS.
JUDGE DAVILA: THAT MS. HOLMES SENT HIM?
MR. DOWNEY: THAT MS. HOLMES SENT HIM, YES.
JUDGE DAVILA: IS THAT THE LAST TWO PAGES?
MR. DOWNEY: NO. IT'S THE LAST PAGE OF THE ATTACHMENT. LET ME SEE IF I CAN MAKE THIS EASIER.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ALWAYS HELPFUL.
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I THINK I CAN DO IT JUST BY WAY OF EXAMPLE. SO WHAT I REALLY WANT TO DO IS IF I CAN JUST ADMIT THE FIRST AND SECOND PAGE, I DON'T NEED TO ADMIT THE ENTIRE --
JUDGE DAVILA: THAT'S FINE. THAT'S FINE. THOSE WILL BE ADMITTED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 12027, PAGES 1 AND 2 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: FIRST OF ALL, LET ME JUST DISPLAY, IF I MIGHT, THE EMAIL THAT IS THE FIRST PAGE OF 12027. AND WHY ARE YOU SENDING THIS EMAIL TO MR. LUCAS AT THIS TIME?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THIS IS A RESPONSE TO ONE OF HIS DILIGENCE REQUESTS.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT THE SECOND PAGE. AND WHAT IS LISTED HERE ON THE SECOND PAGE OF THE EXHIBIT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THIS IS EVERY EXPENSE WE HAD IN THE COMPANY.
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU SEND THAT IN RESPONSE TO HIS REQUEST TO UNDERSTAND THE FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE COMPANY?
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. DID MR. LUCAS ULTIMATELY DECIDE TO INVEST IN THERANOS AS PART OF THE SERIES B ROUND OF THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND AFTER HE INVESTED, DID HE PLAY A ROLE OTHER THAN BEING AN INVESTOR IN THE COMPANY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES. HE BECAME THE CHAIRMAN OF OUR BOARD.
MR. DOWNEY: AND HOW LONG DID HE SERVE IN THAT ROLE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE SERVED IN THAT ROLE FROM I THINK EITHER END OF 2005 OR EARLY 2006 TO JANUARY OF 2013.
MR. DOWNEY: IN ADDITION TO MR. LUCAS, DID ANOTHER VENTURE CAPITALIST, PETE THOMAS, INVEST IN THE SERIES B ROUND IN THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO WAS MR. THOMAS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: MR. THOMAS WAS ALSO A SILICON VALLEY VENTURE CAPITALIST. HE HAD BEEN A PARTNER AT A VENTURE CAPITAL FIRM CALLED IVP FOR A LONG TIME, AND THEN LEFT TO BUILD HIS OWN VENTURE CAPITAL FIRM CALLED ATA VENTURES.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID MR. LUCAS -- OR MR. THOMAS ALSO CONDUCT DUE DILIGENCE IN CONNECTION WITH HIS INVESTMENT INTO THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT 14219.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OKAY.
MR. DOWNEY: AND IS THIS AN EMAIL EXCHANGE BETWEEN YOU AND MR. THOMAS?
MR. DOWNEY: AND I WOULD JUST ASK YOU, IS IT ACCURATE THAT HE ASKED TO REVIEW ALL OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RECORDS OF THE COMPANY?
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID HE ALSO LOOK AT ALL OF THE FINANCIAL RECORDS OF THE COMPANY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID HE ALSO LOOK AT THE AGREEMENTS THAT THE COMPANY HAD MADE WITH THIRD PARTIES?
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, WE'VE HEARD SOME TESTIMONY IN THE CASE ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES. AS PART OF THE SERIES B ROUND, WERE YOU TALKING TO INVESTORS ABOUT THE POTENTIAL FOR THERANOS TO MARKET ITS PRODUCT TO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID SOME OF THE INVESTORS TELL YOU THAT THEY WANTED TO UNDERSTAND BETTER THE POTENTIAL RELATIONSHIP THAT THERANOS MIGHT HAVE WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES?
MR. DOWNEY: WAS MR. THOMAS ONE OF THOSE INVESTORS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE WAS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT DID YOU DO IN RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FROM INVESTORS ABOUT THE PHARMACEUTICAL BUSINESS AT THAT TIME OF THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I OFFERED TO PUT THEM IN TOUCH WITH THE PEOPLE WE WERE WORKING WITH IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES DIRECTLY.
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME SHOW YOU EXHIBIT 15016.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OKAY.
MR. DOWNEY: IS THIS AN EMAIL EXCHANGE ON WHICH YOURSELF AND MR. THOMAS APPEAR RELATED TO HIS POTENTIAL INVESTMENT IN THERANOS?
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 15016.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED. IT MAY BE PUBLISHED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 15016 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME LOOK FIRST AT THE BOTTOM EMAIL EXCHANGE. DO YOU SEE WHERE YOU INDICATE THAT YOU'RE INTRODUCING MR. THOMAS TO SOMEONE NAMED DAVID LESTER?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DO.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO WAS DAVID LESTER? WHERE WAS HE WORKING AS OF 2005?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: DR. LESTER WAS OUR POINT PERSON AT PFIZER, AND HE LED SOME OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION GROUPS AT PFIZER.
MR. DOWNEY: AND HAD MR. THOMAS SPECIFICALLY ASKED TO SPEAK TO SOMEONE FROM PFIZER?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DOES THIS EMAIL JUST REFLECT YOUR PUTTING THE TWO IN TOUCH SO THEY COULD TALK?
MR. DOWNEY: AND DO YOU KNOW IF THEY SPOKE?
MR. DOWNEY: AND LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT THE EMAIL AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE. THIS IS AN EMAIL FROM DAVID LESTER TO YOU AND TO MR. THOMAS. DO YOU SEE THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES, I DO.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DO YOU SEE THAT HE INDICATES THAT HE'S WILLING TO TALK TO MR. THOMAS?
MR. DOWNEY: WAS THIS TYPICAL OF YOUR INTRODUCTIONS OF POTENTIAL INVESTORS TO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AS OF THIS TIME?
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. NOW, WE TALKED A MOMENT AGO ABOUT DON LUCAS, SENIOR. I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT CHRIS LUCAS, WHO THE JURY HAS HEARD TESTIMONY FROM IN THIS CASE. WAS CHRIS LUCAS MR. DON LUCAS, SENIOR'S NEPHEW?
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID CHRIS LUCAS ALSO BECOME AN INVESTOR IN THERANOS AS PART OF THE SERIES B INVESTMENT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND HOW DID YOU COME TO MEET CHRIS LUCAS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I MEET HIM THROUGH HIS UNCLE, DON.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU AT SOME POINT COME TO SPEAK TO HIM ABOUT A POTENTIAL INVESTMENT FOR HIS FIRM IN THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID. I DON'T KNOW IF I INITIALLY SPOKE TO HIM DIRECTLY OR IF HIS UNCLE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. DID YOU -- DID HE ASK FOR ANY OF THE ACCESS TO INFORMATION THAT HIS UNCLE AND MR. THOMAS HAD REQUESTED?
MR. DOWNEY: DO YOU KNOW IF HE REQUESTED TO SPEAK TO ANY PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AT THAT TIME?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DON'T THINK SO.
MR. DOWNEY: WOULD YOU HAVE BEEN WILLING AT THAT TIME TO PERMIT HIM TO SPEAK TO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES WITH WHOM PFIZER -- OR WITH WHOM THERANOS POTENTIALLY WOULD HAVE A RELATIONSHIP?
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. WERE YOU SUCCESSFUL IN RAISING SOME MONEY AS PART OF THIS SERIES B ROUND OF INVESTMENT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I WAS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU HIRE SOME ADDITIONAL SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS WITH THAT MONEY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND AT THIS TIME, WHAT DID THE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY REALLY FOCUS ON? WAS IT CONTINUING TO FOCUS ON THE ASSAYS AND THE HARDWARE AND THE SOFTWARE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES, THE ASSAYS, THE HARDWARE, THE SOFTWARE, FIGURING OUT HOW TO BUILD THE TECHNOLOGY, THE MANUFACTURING THAT WENT INTO THAT, AND HOW TO GROW THE COMPANY.
MR. DOWNEY: AND I'D LIKE TO SHOW YOU EXHIBIT 15024. IS 15024 THE FIRST ACTUAL VERSION OF AN ACTUAL DEVICE THAT WAS BUILT OUT OF THE PROTOTYPE?
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 15024.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED. IT MAY BE PUBLISHED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 15024 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: AND CAN YOU IDENTIFY AND JUST TELL THE JURY WHAT IS SHOWN IN THIS DEVICE, WHAT DEVICE THIS IS, AND WHAT OTHER MATERIALS ARE SHOWN IN THE PICTURE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THIS IS THE THERANOS 1.0. IT WAS OUR FIRST SYSTEM. AND YOU SEE ON THE LEFT THE CARTRIDGE, WHICH IS THE DISPOSABLE THAT CONTAINED THE CHEMICALS OR THE CHEMISTRY. AT THE TOP RIGHT, IT'S REALLY SMALL, BUT THERE'S A LITTLE FINGER WHERE YOU COULD TOUCH THE CARTRIDGE AND BLOOD WOULD FLOW IN. AND ON THE RIGHT IS THE DEVICE THAT YOU COULD PUT THE CARTRIDGE INTO. IT WOULD PROCESS THE SAMPLE. AND THEN THE BIG ANTENNA ON THE BACK WAS TO CONNECT TO A CELL NETWORK AND HAVE DATA TRANSFERRED TO THE CLOUD.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND IS THIS THE PRODUCT THAT YOU WERE TALKING TO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES ABOUT DURING THIS TIMEFRAME?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT IS.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. NOW, WERE THERE -- DURING 2006 AND 2007, DO YOU RECALL WHICH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES YOU HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH ABOUT USING THIS DEVICE AND THE OTHER TECHNOLOGIES OF THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DO, SOME OF THEM.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. CAN YOU TELL US WHAT COMPANIES THEY WERE?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: WE WERE TALKING TO PFIZER, TO GLAXOSMITHKLINE, TO NOVARTIS, AND TO BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. DID YOU ULTIMATELY SUCCEED IN SIGNING A CONTRACT WITH GLAXOSMITHKLINE --
MR. DOWNEY: -- RELATED TO THERANOS'S TECHNOLOGY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: WE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHEN DID YOU SIGN THAT AGREEMENT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IN 2006.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. DO YOU KNOW WHEN IN 2006?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I THINK TOWARD THE END OF THE YEAR, PROBABLY THE SECOND HALF OF 2006.
MR. DOWNEY: AND JUST SO WE GET THESE DATES DOWN RELATIVE TO INVESTMENT PERIODS, LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT EXHIBIT 14111, WHICH IS ALREADY IN EVIDENCE. AND DID YOU ENTER INTO THAT AGREEMENT IN 2006?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I'M SORRY, I WAS LOOKING AT THE SCREEN. 14111. YES.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU ALSO IN 2006 ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH PFIZER RELATED TO THEIR USE OF THERANOS TECHNOLOGY?
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK FOR A MOMENT AT EXHIBIT 14112. THAT'S ALSO ALREADY IN EVIDENCE.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU -- WHEN DID YOU ENTER INTO THAT AGREEMENT WITH PFIZER?
JUDGE DAVILA: I'M NOT SURE THIS IS IN EVIDENCE, COUNSEL.
MR. DOWNEY: 14112?
JUDGE DAVILA: I DON'T BELIEVE IT IS.
COURT CLERK: NEITHER 14111 NOR 14112 ARE IN EVIDENCE.
MR. DOWNEY: WELL, IN THAT CASE I WILL MOVE 14111 AND THEN I'LL MOVE THE OTHER.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION TO EITHER, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: THEY'RE ADMITTED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBITS 14111 AND 14112 WERE RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: DID YOU SIGN THE AGREEMENT WITH PFIZER IN NOVEMBER OF 2006?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES, NOVEMBER 2ND OF 2006.
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, WERE THE AGREEMENTS WITH GSK AND THE AGREEMENTS WITH PFIZER SOMETHING THAT YOU TALKED TO INVESTORS ABOUT WHEN YOU WERE RAISING MONEY FOR THE COMPANY IN 2006?
MR. DOWNEY: ALSO IN 2006, DID THE COMPANY CONDUCT DEMONSTRATIONS FOR -- OF ITS TECHNOLOGY FOR CERTAIN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: WE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: WHAT COMPANIES DID YOU CONDUCT DEMONSTRATIONS FOR?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: FOR NOVARTIS AND FOR ELI LILLY.
MR. DOWNEY: TELL US ABOUT THE DEMONSTRATION THAT YOU CONDUCTED FOR NOVARTIS OF THE THERANOS TECHNOLOGY.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: WE RAN OUR TECHNOLOGY IN SWITZERLAND AT ONE OF THEIR OFFICES AND PROCESSED SAMPLES ON CARTRIDGES THAT WE BROUGHT THERE, AND THEN HAD DATA WIRELESSLY TRANSMITTED BACK TO OUR SITE IN CALIFORNIA.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT EXHIBIT 15017.
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: 150 -- OKAY.
MR. DOWNEY: IS 15017 AN EMAIL CONCERNING THE DEMONSTRATION THAT YOU CONDUCTED FOR NOVARTIS IN 2006?
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF BOTH PAGES OF THIS EXHIBIT.
MR. LEACH: YOUR HONOR, FOUNDATION, HEARSAY. I ALSO DON'T BELIEVE THIS WAS PRODUCED IN DISCOVERY UNTIL LAST NIGHT.
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, THIS IS A FIVE LINE EMAIL WITH A PICTURE ATTACHED.
JUDGE DAVILA: I SEE THAT. CAN YOU LAY A FOUNDATION AS TO -- A LITTLE MORE FOUNDATION ON THIS.
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: WHEN YOU WERE TALKING TO INVESTORS IN 2006, DID YOU DISCUSS A POTENTIAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NOVARTIS AND THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU SAY TO SOME OF THOSE POTENTIAL INVESTORS THAT THERANOS WAS GOING TO CONDUCT A DEMONSTRATION OF ITS TECHNOLOGY AT NOVARTIS?
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 15017.
JUDGE DAVILA: JUST LAY A FOUNDATION ON WHAT THE PHOTOGRAPH IS AND WHAT THE IMAGE IS.
MR. DOWNEY: OH, I'M SORRY. YES.
MR. DOWNEY: DO YOU RECOGNIZE THE INDIVIDUALS IN THE PHOTOGRAPH THAT IS ATTACHED TO 15017?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DO.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO ARE THEY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THEY ARE SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS FROM THERANOS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DO YOU KNOW WHEN THIS PHOTOGRAPH WAS TAKEN?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I BELIEVE IN NOVEMBER OF 2006, YES.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHAT WAS -- WHAT WERE THEY DOING IN THIS PHOTOGRAPH, IF YOU KNOW?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THEY ARE MONITORING THE RESULTS COMING IN FROM THE PROCESSING OF THE SAMPLES IN SWITZERLAND.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF THE EXHIBIT.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED. IT MAY BE PUBLISHED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 15017 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: LET'S LOOK FIRST AT THE EMAIL. AND IF WE JUST LOOK AT THE ADDRESS ON TOP, THIS IS AN EMAIL FROM AN INDIVIDUAL NAMED JOHN HOWARD TO YOU IN NOVEMBER OF 2006. DO YOU SEE THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DO.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO WAS JOHN HOWARD?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: JOHN HOWARD WAS LEADING OUR R&D AT THIS POINT. HE WAS ONE OF THE EXECUTIVES FROM I.B.M. THAT I HAD MET AT STANFORD.
MR. DOWNEY: AND LET'S GO DOWN TO THE BOTTOM OF THE EMAIL. AND HE SAYS TO YOU, "WHAT A GRATIFYING MORNING. THIS HAS BEEN OUR FIRST LIVE DEMO." WAS THE DEMONSTRATION THAT THERANOS CONDUCTED FOR NOVARTIS IN SWITZERLAND THE FIRST DEMONSTRATION OF THE COMPANY'S TECHNOLOGY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: OF THAT ONE SERIES SYSTEM, YES.
MR. DOWNEY: AND THEN HE GOES ON TO SAY, "THE ABCS TEAM WAS ALL OVER EVERY KEYSTROKE AND LOG ENTRY AS THE DATA CAME BACK." CAN YOU TELL US WHAT THE ABCS TEAM WAS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES. THAT IS WHAT WE WERE CALLING OUR SOFTWARE AT THE TIME, THE SOFTWARE THAT WOULD TELL THE INSTRUMENT WHAT TO DO. SO YOU WOULD PUT A CARTRIDGE IN A DEVICE, THE BAR CODE ON THE CARTRIDGE WOULD CALL THE CLOUD, AND THE CLOUD WOULD SEND COMMANDS BACK TO THE DEVICE TO TELL IT WHAT TO RUN, AND THEN THE DATA WOULD GO BACK TO THE CLOUD. SO THAT CLOUD TECHNOLOGY WAS WHAT WE CALLED THE ABCS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU UNDERSTAND THAT OTHERS AT THERANOS THOUGHT THAT THE DEMONSTRATION OF THERANOS'S TECHNOLOGY IN 2006 WAS SUCCESSFUL?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU FEEL THAT WAY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME ASK YOU TO LOOK AT EXHIBIT 13762. IS THIS AN EMAIL THAT YOU SENT TO ALL THERANOS EMPLOYEES AFTER THE DEMONSTRATION AT NOVARTIS?
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 13762.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED. IT MAY BE PUBLISHED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 13762 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME JUST DISPLAY IT. DO YOU SEE WHERE YOU SAY, "WE NAILED THIS ONE. YOU ALL DID AN INCREDIBLE JOB IN MAKING THIS HAPPEN - THIS IS THE THERANOS WAY." IS THAT A COMMENT ON THE DEMONSTRATION THAT HAD BEEN CONDUCTED IN SWITZERLAND?
MR. DOWNEY: BY THE WAY, WHEN YOU WENT TO SWITZERLAND, WHO WAS WITH YOU?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: SOME OF OUR ENGINEERS AND SCIENTISTS AND THE BUSINESS PEOPLE THAT WE HAD WHO WERE WORKING WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES.
MR. DOWNEY: NOW, AROUND THE SAME TIME THAT YOU WERE SIGNING THESE CONTRACTS AND CONDUCTING THESE DEMONSTRATIONS, DID YOU DECIDE TO CONDUCT ANOTHER SERIES OF FUND RAISING FOR THERANOS TO FUND SOME OF THESE ACTIVITIES?
MR. DOWNEY: AND WAS THAT IN LATE 2006?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT WAS.
MR. DOWNEY: DID MR. LUCAS AND MR. THOMAS ALSO INVEST IN THE SERIES C ROUND OF THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THEY DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO ELSE? DID MR. CHRIS LUCAS INVEST IN THAT ROUND?
MR. DOWNEY: AND WHO ELSE INVESTED IN THE SERIES C ROUND AT THERANOS?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: LARRY ELLISON INVESTED, AND SOME OF THE FRIENDS AND FAMILY, OR PEOPLE THAT I HAD MET THROUGH FRIENDS AND FAMILY IN THE EARLIER ROUNDS INVESTED AS WELL.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. AND HOW DID YOU COME TO BE IN TOUCH WITH MR. ELLISON?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: THROUGH DON LUCAS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID YOU ALSO HAVE THE EXPERIENCE, AS PART OF THIS ROUND OF FUND RAISING, THAT SOME POTENTIAL INVESTORS WANTED TO TALK TO THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES THAT THERANOS WAS SIGNING CONTRACTS WITH AND HOPING TO WORK WITH?
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. LET ME SHOW YOU EXHIBIT 15013. I'M NOT GOING TO INTRODUCE THIS FOR THE TIME BEING. IF YOU'LL JUST TAKE A MOMENT TO REVIEW THAT. WELL, YOU KNOW, IT MIGHT JUST BE EASIER TO ADMIT IT. LET'S -- IS THIS AN EMAIL FROM YOU TO A POTENTIAL INVESTOR IN CONNECTION WITH RAISING MONEY FOR THE SERIES C INVESTMENT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: IT IS.
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, I MOVE THE ADMISSION OF 15013.
MR. LEACH: NO OBJECTION, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: IT'S ADMITTED.
(DEFENDANT'S EXHIBIT 15013 WAS RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE.)
BY MR. DOWNEY:
MR. DOWNEY: IF WE COULD DISPLAY THAT. IF YOU WOULD LOOK AT THE BOTTOM EMAIL, IT'S AN EMAIL FROM YOU TO BOB GRADY IN JULY OF 2006. WHO WAS BOB GRADY?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE WAS A PARTNER AT AN INVESTMENT FIRM CALLED CARLYLE.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WAS HE EVALUATING A POTENTIAL INVESTMENT IN THERANOS AS OF THIS TIME?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE WAS.
MR. DOWNEY: AND WOULD THAT INVESTMENT ULTIMATELY HAVE BEEN AS PART OF THE SERIES C INVESTMENT IN THERANOS?
MR. DOWNEY: AND IS THAT THE SAME ROUND OF INVESTMENT THAT -- WHEN ALAN EISENMAN FIRST INVESTED IN THERANOS?
MR. DOWNEY: AND ALSO CHRIS LUCAS INVESTED IN THAT ROUND AGAIN; CORRECT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID.
MR. DOWNEY: AND ALSO DID MR. HALL, CRAIG HALL INVESTED IN THAT ROUND OF INVESTMENT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: HE DID. I THINK HE INVESTED IN CHRIS'S FUND, WHICH INVESTED IN THAT ROUND OF INVESTMENT.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. SO I SHOULD ASK YOU, WAS MR. HALL AN INDIRECT INVESTOR IN THERANOS AS PART OF THAT ROUND?
MR. DOWNEY: IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE EMAIL BETWEEN YOURSELF AND MR. GRADY, YOU LIST A NUMBER OF NAMES, AND THEY APPEAR TO BE INDIVIDUALS AT, AMONG OTHER COMPANIES, PFIZER, GLAXOSMITHKLINE, BRISTOL MYERS, NOVARTIS. CAN YOU -- IS THAT, IN FACT, WHO THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE?
MR. DOWNEY: AND CAN YOU TELL US WHY YOU'RE GIVING THE NAMES OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS TO THIS POTENTIAL INVESTOR?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: YES. HE HAD ASKED FOR THE ABILITY TO SPEAK WITH PEOPLE THAT WE WERE WORKING WITH IN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, AND I WAS CONNECTING HIM TO THOSE PEOPLE.
MR. DOWNEY: AND DID SOME -- WERE THERE SOME OCCASIONS WHERE THERE WERE INVESTORS WHO WOULD NOT ASK FOR THIS INFORMATION?
MR. DOWNEY: BUT IF INDIVIDUALS ASKED FOR THIS INFORMATION, DID YOU PROVIDE THEM INFORMATION ABOUT CONTACTS AT THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES SO THAT THEY COULD TALK TO THEM?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: I DID.
MR. DOWNEY: WHY DID YOU DO THAT?
ELIZABETH A. HOLMES: BECAUSE I THOUGHT THAT THE PEOPLE THAT WE WERE WORKING WITH IN THE PHARMA COMPANIES COULD EXPLAIN THE IMPACT AND THE POTENTIAL OF OUR WORK DIRECTLY.
MR. DOWNEY: OKAY. YOUR HONOR, I'M GOING TO MOVE TO ABOUT A 20 MINUTE SECTION NOW, SO --
JUDGE DAVILA: LET'S TAKE OUR WEEKEND BREAK NOW, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. THANK YOU, MR. DOWNEY. I THINK MONDAY, MS. KRATZMANN, THAT'S A HALF DAY; IS THAT RIGHT?
COURT CLERK: YES, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: SO WE'LL BE IN SESSION AT 9:00 O'CLOCK, 9:00 O'CLOCK, AND WE'LL END PROBABLY AT ABOUT 1:00 O'CLOCK. SO, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, LET ME REMIND YOU OF THE ADMONITION, PLEASE. DO NOT DO ANY RESEARCH. DO NOT READ, LISTEN TO, TALK ABOUT OR MAKE ANY DECISIONS ABOUT ANYTHING IN THIS CASE. BEFORE YOU LEAVE -- MS. HOLMES, YOU CAN STAND DOWN, PLEASE. THANK YOU. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I DO WANT TO TALK TO YOU. YOU RECALL THAT WE HAD SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THE MEDIA MOTION AND YOUR INFORMATION REGARDING THE QUESTIONNAIRES. PLEASE RECALL THAT I HAD INTERVIEWS WITH YOU, EACH OF YOU, WITH COUNSEL IN MY OFFICE REGARDING YOUR SPECIFIC COMMENTS AND THOUGHTS ABOUT THOSE QUESTIONNAIRES. I THINK I TOLD YOU ABOUT FIVE WEEKS AGO THAT I WAS GOING TO REVIEW THE MOTION AND I WAS GOING TO KEEP YOU INFORMED ABOUT THE COURT'S DECISION. I THINK YOU HAD EXPRESSED SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT. I JUST WANT TO TELL YOU NOW -- MR. DOWNEY, I JUST WANT TO CONFIRM, IS THIS A GOOD TIME? SHOULD WE WAIT FOR ANOTHER TIME FOR THIS? I'M SORRY, SIR.
MR. DOWNEY: WHATEVER SUITS THE COURT.
MR. SCHENK: YES, THIS IS FINE. THANK YOU.
JUDGE DAVILA: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. SO, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I DO WANT TO TELL YOU THAT I HAVE MADE A DECISION ON THAT MOTION. IT IS GOING TO BE POSTED, THAT MEANS IT WILL BE POSTED ON OUR ECF DOCKET THIS AFTERNOON. IT WILL BE A PUBLIC POSTING SO EVERYONE WILL HAVE ACCESS TO IT. I DO WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT IN REGARDS TO THE MOTION FROM THE MEDIA COALITION, I HAVE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART THAT MOTION. AND I JUST WANT TO TELL YOU, I AM GOING TO MAINTAIN THE COMPLETED JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES UNDER SEAL FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE TRIAL. THEY WILL REMAIN UNDER SEAL. AFTER THERE'S A VERDICT IN THIS CASE, OR AFTER THIS EVIDENCE AND THIS CASE IS FINISHED, THE COURT -- AND AFTER I HAVE RELEASED YOU FROM YOUR JURY SERVICE -- I WILL THEN PARTIALLY UNSEAL THE QUESTIONNAIRES WITH LIMITED REDACTIONS, WHICH IS TO SAY INFORMATION IS GOING TO BE REDACTED, NAMES AND ADDRESSES. SOME OF YOU HAVE EXPRESSED TO ME IN CHAMBERS SPECIFIC ISSUES, AND I'VE ADDRESSED THOSE IN THE ORDER. SOME OF THEM -- SOME OF YOU HAVE ALSO INDICATED THAT YOU HAVE LESS FEELINGS ABOUT REDACTIONS. AND I'M MINDFUL OF THOSE REQUESTS AND THOSE FEELINGS, AND THE ORDER WILL REFLECT THAT ACCORDINGLY AS WELL. BUT I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT NONE OF THIS INFORMATION IS GOING TO BE RELEASED WHILE YOU'RE STILL IN TRIAL AND YOU'RE STILL SERVING AS JURORS IN THIS TRIAL. I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT. THOSE QUESTIONNAIRES WILL REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER UNTIL YOUR TRIAL SERVICE IS FINISHED. AND THEN, AGAIN, AS I SAID, THERE WILL BE LIMITED, LIMITED REDACTIONS.
(PAUSE IN PROCEEDINGS.)
JUDGE DAVILA: LET ME SAY, I DON'T -- AND I'M TELLING YOU THIS NOW BECAUSE I DON'T WANT YOU TO -- YOU'VE RAISED A CONCERN ABOUT IT. I DON'T WANT YOU TO BE THINKING ABOUT THIS OR LET THIS IN ANY WAY INTERFERE WITH YOUR, AS I TOLD YOU IN CHAMBERS WHEN WE MET, INTERFERE IN ANY WAY WITH YOUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE TO FOCUS AS YOU HAVE BEEN DOING ON THE ISSUES IN THIS CASE. I SHOULD TELL YOU THAT ADDRESSES, THOSE ARE GOING TO REMAIN REDACTED, THAT TYPE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION. BUT I JUST WANT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT TODAY SO YOU'LL HAVE THAT INFORMATION. ALL RIGHT. LET ME REMIND YOU OF THE ADMONITION THAT REMAINS IN PLACE. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, LET ME TELL YOU THIS, TOO, AND I APOLOGIZE I DIDN'T GET THIS DONE NOW, BUT WHEN YOU COME BACK MONDAY, I WILL HAVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER FOR EACH OF YOU, AND YOU'LL HAVE A COPY OF IT. AND MS. KRATZMANN WILL PROVIDE YOU A COPY OF MY ORDER THAT IS A LITTLE MORE INFORMATIVE THAN WHAT I'M TELLING YOU NOW. BUT NOTHING IS GOING TO BE RELEASED UNTIL THE TRIAL IS OVER. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. HAVE A GREAT WEEKEND, AND WE'LL SEE YOU MONDAY MORNING. THANK YOU.
(JURY OUT AT 4:06 P.M.).
JUDGE DAVILA: THANK YOU. PLEASE BE SEATED. THE RECORD SHOULD REFLECT THAT THE JURY HAS LEFT FOR THE WEEKEND. COUNSEL, I JUST WANT TO CHECK IN, ANYTHING FURTHER BEFORE WE BREAK?
MR. LEACH: VERY BRIEFLY, YOUR HONOR. I JUST WANT TO NOTE.
JUDGE DAVILA: YOU CAN TAKE YOUR MASK OFF. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT.
MR. LEACH: I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT NUMBER, BUT THERE'S AT LEAST 20 TO 25 EXHIBITS IN THE DIRECT EXAMINATION BINDER FROM MS. HOLMES THAT WERE PRODUCED TO US LAST NIGHT. MOST OF THEM WE DIDN'T OBJECT TO BECAUSE WE DIDN'T WANT TO DO THAT IN FRONT OF THE JURY. THE COURT HAS SET MULTIPLE RULE 16 DEADLINES IN THIS CASE. THESE ARE DOCUMENTS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PRODUCED IN DISCOVERY AND ARE BEING PRODUCED IN ADVANCE OF THE EXAMINATION THE NIGHT BEFORE. WE'LL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO THROUGH THOSE OVER THE WEEKEND, AND THAT PART I'M NOT RAISING AN OBJECTION TO. AND I DO THINK THERE ARE MORE COMING. I JUST NEED TO NOTE, THESE AREN'T PRODUCED IN DISCOVERY. WE'RE GETTING THEM LITERALLY FOR THE FIRST TIME THE NIGHT BEFORE. SO IT'S NOT A MATTER OF TAKING A DOCUMENT THAT WAS PRODUCED AND MAKING AN ASSESSMENT AND WE'RE GOING TO ACTUALLY USE THAT IN THE TRIAL. WE'RE GETTING THIS IN REALTIME. IT'S NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS. I'M NOT ASKING FOR ANYTHING NOW. I JUST DON'T WANT THIS TO CONTINUE.
JUDGE DAVILA: THIS IS SORT OF WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS MORNING, MR. DOWNEY.
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME --
JUDGE DAVILA: YOU CAN TAKE YOUR MASK OFF, MR. DOWNEY.
MR. DOWNEY: LET ME CUT THROUGH THIS. I MEAN, I OBVIOUSLY HAVE SOME CONCERNS, AND HAD SOME CONCERNS UNTIL THE CASE RESTED. BUT I WILL GET -- I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE MATERIALS THAT WILL BE RELEVANT TO MONDAY AND TUESDAY'S EXAMINATION THAT MR. LEACH DOESN'T HAVE, BUT IF THERE ARE, I WILL MAKE SURE HE GETS THEM SO HE CAN LOOK AT THEM ALL DAY SUNDAY AND SEE WHAT VIEW HE HAS. I DON'T KNOW ALL OF WHAT THEY ARE, YOUR HONOR, TO BE CANDID. SO I'M NOT SITTING ON SOME TROVE OF DOCUMENTS, BUT I --
JUDGE DAVILA: I APPRECIATE THAT. BUT YOUR TEAM MIGHT HAVE SOME KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THAT THAT THEY COULD SHARE WITH YOU.
MR. DOWNEY: WELL, YOUR HONOR, IN FAIRNESS, I MEAN, THEY JUST RESTED. YOU KNOW, SOME OF THESE -- AND I GAVE THEM THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THEY RESTED. I WANT TO BE COOPERATIVE WITH HIM SO THAT WE CAN HAVE GOOD ORDER IN COURT. I DON'T THINK THE WITNESS WILL BE ON CROSS-EXAMINATION PROBABLY EVEN UNTIL NEXT WEEK, BUT IF HE HAS ISSUES RELATIVE TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OR HE WANTS TO RAISE THOSE IN ADVANCE, I'LL GET THEM TO HIM IN ADVANCE SO HE CAN --
JUDGE DAVILA: WELL, THANK YOU. LET ME JUST SAY, YOU KNOW, YOU'VE BEEN -- BOTH SIDES HAVE BEEN COOPERATIVE --
MR. DOWNEY: YES.
JUDGE DAVILA: -- NOTWITHSTANDING MY COMMENTS. AND MY COMMENTS, YOU UNDERSTAND THE GENESIS OF MY COMMENTS IN TRYING TO KEEP THE TRIAL GOING AND THAT TYPE OF THING. BUT YOU BOTH HAVE BEEN VERY COOPERATIVE. THE TRIALS HAVE -- AS MS. SAHARIA REMINDED ME THIS MORNING, TRIALS ARE, THEY'RE A MOVEABLE FEAST. AND THINGS HAPPEN IN TRIALS. WE ALL UNDERSTAND THAT. AND SO I APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS, BOTH SIDES' EFFORTS TO TAKE CARE OF THESE ISSUES AS BEST YOU CAN OUTSIDE OF COURT, OUTSIDE OF THE JURY'S TIME, AND THAT'S REALLY WHAT WE'RE AFTER.
MR. DOWNEY: I UNDERSTAND THAT, YOUR HONOR. AND JUST IN THE -- A COMMENT ON SORT OF A CASE MANAGEMENT NATURE FOR YOUR HONOR. I DON'T -- I HAVE IN MY MIND, WHICH I WON'T SAY TO THE COURT, BUT I HAVE IN MIND HOW LONG I THINK THE DEFENSE CASE WILL GO. I THINK SORT OF CONSISTENT WITH THAT, MY EXPECTATION HAS BEEN NOW THAT, YOU KNOW, THE DIRECT EXAMINATION MAY CONTINUE THROUGH NEXT WEEK. WE JUST HAVE, YOU KNOW, A DAY AND A HALF.
JUDGE DAVILA: SURE. RIGHT.
MR. DOWNEY: BUT IT DOESN'T -- I THINK WHERE WE ARE DOES NOT CHANGE MY BASIC ESTIMATE OF HOW LONG THE DEFENSE CASE IS LIKELY TO LAST.
JUDGE DAVILA: OKAY. THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE THAT. THANK YOU. ANYTHING FURTHER FROM YOUR SIDE, MR. LEACH?
MR. LEACH: NO, YOUR HONOR.
MR. DOWNEY: NOTHING FURTHER, YOUR HONOR.
JUDGE DAVILA: OKAY. HAVE A GOOD WEEKEND.
MR. DOWNEY: YOUR HONOR, CAN I JUST SAY ON THE QUESTIONNAIRE ISSUE --
JUDGE DAVILA: YEAH.
MR. DOWNEY: -- I WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT THE ORDER. THE ONLY QUESTION THAT REMAINS IN MY MIND IS -- AND I DON'T KNOW IF THIS CONCERN WAS EXPRESSED OR NOT, BUT I JUST WANT TO LOOK AT THE TRANSCRIPT -- I DON'T WANT TO TAKE THE JURY'S TIME OR OUR TIME TO HAVE TO TALK TO THE JURY AGAIN, BUT I HAVE THAT CONCERN. SO I WANT TO SEE IF, ON ONE READING OF THE TRANSCRIPT THAT'S UNNECESSARY, BUT LET ME TAKE A LOOK, AND IF THERE IS, I'LL LET THE COURT KNOW ON MONDAY AND WE CAN DO IT AT SOME POINT I SUPPOSE.
JUDGE DAVILA: ARE YOU AND MR. SCHENK BUSY JUST NOW?
MR. DOWNEY: NO, NO, I'M AVAILABLE, YEAH.
JUDGE DAVILA: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. MAYBE -- YOU CAN CHECK WITH MR. SCHENK TO SEE HIS AVAILABILITY, AND MR. LEACH, BECAUSE I MIGHT HAVE COPIES AVAILABLE. LET ME CHECK AND SEE.
MR. DOWNEY: NO, NO. I HAVE THE -- MAYBE I'M NOT MAKING MYSELF CLEAR. MY RECOLLECTION OF THE --
JUDGE DAVILA: NO, I'M GOING TO GIVE YOU A COPY OF THE ORDER.
MR. DOWNEY: FAIR ENOUGH. I'LL TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND WE CAN SEE.
JUDGE DAVILA: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
MR. DOWNEY: YES.
MR. LEACH: THANK YOU.
COURT CLERK: COURT IS ADJOURNED.
(COURT ADJOURNED AT 4:11 P.M.)