Skip to content
evidenceevidencedocumentFederal Criminal TrialWeekly or biweekly aggregated customer feedback reports received by Daniel Edlin and Elizabeth Holmes; the defense proposed them as state-of-mind evidence rather than for the truth of the customer accounts, and the prosecution opposed admission of the binder.Contains weekly or biweekly aggregated customer feedback reports received by Daniel Edlin and Elizabeth Holmes. The defense proposed them as state-of-mind evidence rather than for the truth of the customer accounts, and the prosecution opposed the binder.← All Evidence
Documents & Records

Weekly or biweekly aggregated customer feedback reports received by Daniel Edlin and Elizabeth Holmes; the defense proposed them as state-of-mind evidence rather than for the truth of the customer accounts, and the prosecution opposed admission of the binder.

Contains weekly or biweekly aggregated customer feedback reports received by Daniel Edlin and Elizabeth Holmes. The defense proposed them as state-of-mind evidence rather than for the truth of the customer accounts, and the prosecution opposed the binder.

Weekly or biweekly aggregated customer feedback reports received by Daniel Edlin and Elizabeth Holmes; the defense proposed them as state-of-mind evidence rather than for the truth of the customer accounts, and the prosecution opposed admission of the binder.
1 mention

About

The defense proposed the reports as evidence of state of mind rather than for the truth of the customer accounts, while the prosecution opposed the binder.

Mentions (1)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialAug 31, 2021 – Jan 3, 2022