Documents & Records
Two HIV-related test reports presented through Erin Tompkins were disputed: the defense argued that neither Tompkins nor the jury could interpret them without qualified testimony, while the government characterized them as conflicting results with probative value.
Shows two HIV-related test reports presented through Erin Tompkins. The defense argued that neither Tompkins nor the jury could interpret them without qualified testimony, while the government characterized them as conflicting results with probative value.
Two HIV-related test reports presented through Erin Tompkins were disputed: the defense argued that neither Tompkins nor the jury could interpret them without qualified testimony, while the government characterized them as conflicting results with probative value.
MentionedFederal Criminal Trial
About
The reports were the subject of a dispute over whether they could be interpreted without qualified testimony and whether their conflicting results had probative value.