Skip to content
evidenceevidencetestimonyFederal Criminal TrialThe government's proposed Steven Burd testimony that Safeway spent approximately $300 million building out hundreds of stores after representations by Elizabeth Holmes; the defense disputed its relevance and sought exclusion because of prejudice and collateral factual disputes.Proposed testimony from Steven Burd would state that Safeway spent approximately $300 million building out hundreds of stores after representations by Elizabeth Holmes. The defense disputed the testimony's relevance and sought its exclusion because of prejudice and collateral factual disputes.← All Evidence
Testimony References

The government's proposed Steven Burd testimony that Safeway spent approximately $300 million building out hundreds of stores after representations by Elizabeth Holmes; the defense disputed its relevance and sought exclusion because of prejudice and collateral factual disputes.

Proposed testimony from Steven Burd would state that Safeway spent approximately $300 million building out hundreds of stores after representations by Elizabeth Holmes. The defense disputed the testimony's relevance and sought its exclusion because of prejudice and collateral factual disputes.

The government's proposed Steven Burd testimony that Safeway spent approximately $300 million building out hundreds of stores after representations by Elizabeth Holmes; the defense disputed its relevance and sought exclusion because of prejudice and collateral factual disputes.
1 mention

About

The government proposed the testimony concerning Safeway's spending after representations by Holmes, while the defense disputed its relevance and sought exclusion based on prejudice and collateral factual disputes.

Mentions (1)

FederalFederal Criminal TrialAug 31, 2021 – Jan 3, 2022